On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>> local res=
>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?,"
>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?,"
>>> done
>>>
>>> echo "[${res%,}]"
>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used
>> since 2010?
>>
> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the eclass
> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if Ruby
> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>
<sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! </sarcasm>** Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
