On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: >>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass >>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass >>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() { >>> local res= >>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do >>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \ >>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}?," >>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_implementation}(-)?," >>> done >>> >>> echo "[${res%,}]" >> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer used >> since 2010? >> > You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the eclass > maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if Ruby > project doesn't have some secret overlays using it. > <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! </sarcasm>*
* Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature