On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>>>> local res=
>>>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>> ntation}?,"
>>>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
>>>>> done
>>>>>
>>>>> echo "[${res%,}]"
>>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
>>>> used
>>>> since 2010?
>>>>
>>> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
>>> eclass
>>> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if
>>> Ruby
>>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>>>
>> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
>> </sarcasm>*
>>
>> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
>>
> Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
> chatter?
>
>
Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
