On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > > > +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
> > > > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
> > > > local res=
> > > > for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
> > > > has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
> > > > - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> > > > ntation}?,"
> > > > + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
> > > > ntation}(-)?,"
> > > > done
> > > >
> > > > echo "[${res%,}]"
> > > Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
> > > used
> > > since 2010?
> > >
> > You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
> > eclass
> > maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if
> > Ruby
> > project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
> >
> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
> </sarcasm>*
>
> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
>
Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
chatter?
