On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:58 PM William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > > > go-module.eclass. > > > > > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa > > > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM. > > > > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > It seems like you're being very lazy about this. At a minimum, you > > should do the following: > > I will respond to your points below, but first, I take offense to your > accusation of me being lazy especially since it seems pretty obvious you > didn't attempt to research my work before you said it.
The phrasing of your original email, combined with a question you asked in IRC lead me to the wrong conclusion. Sorry about that.
