On 6/7/20 9:14 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: > > Glad to read your offer. Yes, please do so. > > I think it would hurt the Gentoo project if single developers delete > projects > > - without without informing the project members > - without prior discussion (on gentoo-dev for example), > - without vote/consent > - without an organized shutdown (reassign bugs, archive things...). > > However we should continue to find a general solution for the problems > discussed in this thread and find a general consent. > > Thank you. > The "voting" and "discussion" happened in #gentoo-dev IRC channel. Every participant was unhappy with the state of graphics project, and even after pinging the project, no members responded. This "discussion" has been ongoing for a while now. While I agree the outcome wasn't clean, in my eyes attempts to contact project has been made.
Now for the future, I wouldn't mind having a "last rite: XYV Project" or
similar e-mail sent to gentoo-dev{-announce} before action to ebuilds is
taken, so the project members/lead has one final chance to stop it.
Maybe this even encourages us to go through some of the more inactive
projects currently?
-- juippis
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
