On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:57 +0000, Max Magorsch wrote:
> Hi all,
> Good news regarding packages.g.o!
> While the new packages.g.o version went into production some time
> ago,
> this also led to some false warnings about outdated package versions.
> This is because we currently take information about outdated package
> versions from repology.org, which are not always accurate.

Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ?
It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling
those manually for some time now ;)


Reply via email to