On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap) > > > > Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01 > > Author: Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> > > Posted: 2021-08-15 > > Revision: 1 > > News-Item-Format: 2.0 > > Display-If-Profile: default/linux/uclibc/* > > > > uClibc-ng is mostly abandoned upstream, and since my RFC in Jan 2021, > > noone has volunteered to step up maintenance or expressed interest in > > the uClibc-ng profiles. With this announcement we last-rite the "uclibc" > > profiles, which will be removed on 2023/01/01. For parties interested in > > an alternative libc, consider moving to musl, which is supported. > > 2023? That seems like a pretty long time to wait to remove something > that isn't very well supported right now.
+1 While I have no involvement with uClibc-ng, it does seem awfully long before removal. -Aaron
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
