On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:54:19PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 8/17/21 2:24 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:40 AM Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> Can I get feedback on the following news item? (BTW, thanks soap) > >>> > >>> Title: uClibc-ng retirement on 2023/01/01 > >>> Author: Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> > >>> Posted: 2021-08-15 > >>> Revision: 1 > >>> News-Item-Format: 2.0 > >>> Display-If-Profile: default/linux/uclibc/* > >>> > >>> uClibc-ng is mostly abandoned upstream, and since my RFC in Jan 2021, > >>> noone has volunteered to step up maintenance or expressed interest in > >>> the uClibc-ng profiles. With this announcement we last-rite the "uclibc" > >>> profiles, which will be removed on 2023/01/01. For parties interested in > >>> an alternative libc, consider moving to musl, which is supported. > >> > >> 2023? That seems like a pretty long time to wait to remove something > >> that isn't very well supported right now. > > > > +1 > > > > While I have no involvement with uClibc-ng, it does seem awfully long > > before removal. > > > > -Aaron > > > > How does 2022-08-01 sound? That's about 1 year.
Since we know it is broken, a year even seems long. Also, We can't get rid of the uclibc-based profiles until uclibc is removed. Thanks, William > > -- > Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. > Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] > E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA > GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
