On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 21:39 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: To start with your last question since that is the most fundamental one for me:
> So do we really remove packages because a 2nd-order test-only > dependency > fails it's own tests? (aruba:0 failing tests on Ruby 3 being the only > reason I can see to remove stuff right now). Yes, if you want packages to maintained by the Ruby team then they must have working tests, and consequently the dependencies, including test dependencies, must also have them. The test suites are the only thing that makes it feasible to maintain a large number of ruby packages without actually using them. > Looking deeper, I think the <puppet-6 dep is wrong, because upstream > CI > tests on Ruby 3.1 + Puppet7 already successfully. The Gemfile doesn't > lock in old Puppet either. > https://github.com/voxpupuli/hiera-eyaml/actions/runs/4280324437/jobs/7451960271 Yes, it looks like any working "puppet" command is fine. I've updated this to depend on either puppet-agent or puppet. Kind regards, Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
