On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Kinard <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I don't see a point in doing an R10K-specific mips4 build.  The standard
> mips4 build is good enough, and users of R10K systems can rebuild to gain
> the R10K enhancements if needed.

That's not true, as far as I'm aware. glibc for instance has
compile-time work-arounds for R10k errata. Hangs result without the
fix.

Reply via email to