On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:09, Brian Harring wrote: > We've pretty much ignored the minor, and abused the micro for both bug > fixing and feature inclusion. Thoughts on using micro for _strictly_ > bug fixes, and macro for features?
I suggested this before, but it didn't go down too well... > Yes we'll run aground of the dead 2.1 release (not incredibly happy > about that), but I'd like to see if we can get bug fixes out a bit > quicker, with some semblence of a gurantee we're not tagging in stuff > an admin isn't going to care about. What sort of bug fixes are you looking to get out quicker? While the EAPI stuff drew out .53 a little longer than originally expected it was still only 30 days from first rc to final (assuming _rc7 is final). I can't really see the necessity for getting non-regression fixes out "quicker". At the moment, a lot of fixes go out all at once rather than in lots of small bumps. I doubt the overall speed would change very much. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
