I'll answer the other parts later as I'm too tired now...

On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:57, Brian Harring wrote:
> Offhand... what's the non-cache intention of this?  I'm not seeing the
> gain for stable aside from a more complex handling of cache plugins,
> and allowing for python to lose it's marbles in importing- case in
> point, while you're trying to do lookups in each sys.path for a plugin
> namespace, you're still going to have a l->r namespace pollution.

There are cache plugins. There are now elog plugins. emaint is hoped to have 
plugins. There's talk of repoman having plugins... Just unifying it.

--
Jason Stubbs
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to