On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:31:59 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for
> > 2.0.53 so am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out
> > and let the arch teams mark it stable when they're ready (or stick
> > with 2.0.51.22-r3 if it pleaseth them).
>
> [snip]
>
> > There's a few things listed on the new
> > (still unreleased?) project index and I'm looking to get the
> > dependency stuff refactored and moved out of emerge.. What are the
> > shortterm goals?
>
> For me my short term goals are to see these things happen
>
> * post_sync action hook (.53/.54 )
> * pax-utils depends ( .53 )
If we use it we have to dep on it, so not really a feature by itself.
> * new prepstrip offering splitdebug ( .53/.54 )
> * misc cleanups of dyn_install (.54 )
> * seeing CDPEND stop being created for the VDB ( .53 )
Yeah, CDEPEND has to die (although it technically never lived)
> * flattened vdb {P,R,}DEPEND (.54 )
See Jasons mail.
> * introduction of RRDEPEND to the VDB ( .54 )
Rename it to LDEPEND and it's ok (no reverse deps here, just forward
link level deps)
> * VDB prevention of single byte NULL entries being created. ( .54 )
Not sure what this means. Just prevention of empty files in vdb?
Marius
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
