On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
> > > the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
> > 
> > the code is documented as having 64bit limitations for any specific 
> > component.  
> > the last release doesnt have the updated work i did in qatom to handle the 
> > latest atom spec though, and that includes moving from 32bit to 64bit for 
> > components ...
> 
> Sounds good. 
> 
> > 
> > > Maybe another with -rX parsing.
> > 
> > if you're thinking of the open bug, that's an eprefix specific extension.  
> > they turned the X in -rX into a floating point #.  which isnt supported 
> > currently.
> > -mike
> 
> I don't think that was it. But I can't recall well enough off the top of
> my head the problem that somebody pointed out to me one day on irc while
> I was probably too busy.

Mike,
The error was pointed out to me again today on irc by jmbsvicetto and
hoffie, which reminded me of what I had forgot before in this thread. 

The problem was/is that qpkg is not handling -rX extensions properly. 


-- 
Ned Ludd <[email protected]>
Gentoo Linux


Reply via email to