On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > > There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm
> > > > was the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
> > >
> > > the code is documented as having 64bit limitations for any specific
> > > component. the last release doesnt have the updated work i did in qatom
> > > to handle the latest atom spec though, and that includes moving from
> > > 32bit to 64bit for components ...
> >
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > > > Maybe another with -rX parsing.
> > >
> > > if you're thinking of the open bug, that's an eprefix specific
> > > extension. they turned the X in -rX into a floating point #.  which
> > > isnt supported currently.
> >
> > I don't think that was it. But I can't recall well enough off the top of
> > my head the problem that somebody pointed out to me one day on irc while
> > I was probably too busy.
>
> The error was pointed out to me again today on irc by jmbsvicetto and
> hoffie, which reminded me of what I had forgot before in this thread.
>
> The problem was/is that qpkg is not handling -rX extensions properly.

you'll have to be more specific.  like i said, -rX extensions are a prefix 
extension and not part of the standard tree and/or spec.  i'm not going to 
implement every random thing that someone feels like adding.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to