On 3/14/20 1:40 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
> Thank you very much Zac for your answers.
> I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading
> [1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my
> overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo
> portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the
> expected QA rules.
> With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way.
> [1]
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally

The stale cache issues that are mentioned there only applied to the
'pms' cache format which should not be used since around 2012/2013 when
we changed the default for the metadata/layout.conf cache-formats
setting here:


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to