On 3/14/20 1:40 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Thank you very much Zac for your answers. > > I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading > [1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my > overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo > portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the > expected QA rules. > > With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way. > > [1] > https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally
The stale cache issues that are mentioned there only applied to the 'pms' cache format which should not be used since around 2012/2013 when we changed the default for the metadata/layout.conf cache-formats setting here: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e760c8d2a4ccc56e351ac37904c715f596b58e42 -- Thanks, Zac
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
