Craig Webster wrote:
On 26 Nov 2005, at 05:14, Florian D. wrote:
(and i don´t want to have bind running all the time). am i missing
something?
Are the nameservers listed in /etc/resolv.conf recursive resolvers?
Since name resolution works when using your own local nameserver it
sounds like the remote ones may be misbehaving.
Yours,
Craig
--
Craig Webster | t: +44 (0)131 516 8595 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xeriom.NET | f: +44 (0)709 287 1902 | w: http://xeriom.net
yes, for example, i tried these two:
resolver1.recursivedns.net. 63.208.196.113
resolver2.recursivedns.net. 63.208.196.114
which are definitely recursive DNS-servers; but when i type
host -v www.zufallslink.de 63.208.196.113
i get this "incomplete" answer:
Trying "www.zufallslink.de"
Using domain server:
Name: 63.208.196.113
Address: 63.208.196.113#53
Aliases:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36672
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.zufallslink.de. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 518400 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 518400 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
Received 247 bytes from 63.208.196.113#53 in 113 ms
the strange thing is, that i didn´t change my configuration(knowingly).
all of a sudden, it stopped working.
thanks, florian
--
[email protected] mailing list
