it was in package.mask
Cool, I didn't know that there was a file explaning why a package is masked. Then I retracted what I said about announcing downgrades (well, it could still be a little more publicized)
Jehan
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Susie wrote:
Cool, I didn't know that there was a file explaning why a package is masked. Then I retracted what I said about announcing downgrades (well, it could still be a little more publicized)
Jehan
Cool, I didn't know that there was a file explaning why a package is masked. Then I retracted what I said about announcing downgrades (well, it could still be a little more publicized)
Jehan
- [gentoo-user] portage downgrade? Susie
- Re: [gentoo-user] portage downgrade? douggorley
- Re: [gentoo-user] portage downgrade? Susie
- [gentoo-user] Re: portage downgrade? Jehan
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: portage downgrade? Ajay Sharma
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: portage downgra... Susie
- [gentoo-user] Found the Reason (w... Susie
- Re: [gentoo-user] Found the R... Jehan
- Re: [gentoo-user] Found the R... Robert Cole
- Re: [gentoo-user] Found the R... Paul de Vrieze
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: portage downgra... Norberto Bensa
- [gentoo-user] Re: portage downgrade? Jehan
- Re: [gentoo-user] portage downgrade? Terje Kvernes
