Hello All, A couple of thoughts regarding the recent fork:
Did the person that forked fork it because he wasn't going to be making any money from Gentoo? That's the impression I'm getting from all of this. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Now, if that's the case, what's to stop this Zynot guy from acting the same as Daniel Robbins? I'm interested to know more of this, but am wondering if the current forker is really the right person to be supporting. My impressions are that he may not be as pro community as he says he is. At this point it sounds like he's the only one involved, and is not ready to give up control to a group any time soon. --Tim On June 26, 2003 10:09, Jason Gouger wrote: > Peter Ruskin wrote: > >On Thursday 26 Jun 2003 14:48, Ernie Schroder wrote: > > > > > > > >I find this very sad. Zach is not the first dev to leave like this. It > >would seem like the Chief Architect is not easy to work with. > > > >I do hope that my favourite distribution does not go the way of Caldera. > > > >Peter > > You really can't make any assumptions like that without hearing both > sides of the story. The article posted on slashdot was rather one sided > > Jason > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
