On Thursday 26 June 2003 12:29 pm, Timothy James Friesen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> A couple of thoughts regarding the recent fork:
>
> Did the person that forked fork it because he wasn't going to be
> making any money from Gentoo? That's the impression I'm getting from
> all of this. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Now, if that's the case, what's to stop this Zynot guy from acting
> the same as Daniel Robbins?
The point is that he is making no claims to be "not for profit". In
fact he said in his piece that he intends to make this the focus of his
business. D. R. should be so up front!
I have nothing personal afainst Daniel making monet from his "baby" but
the secrecy and ethical questions do pique my interest.
>
> I'm interested to know more of this, but am wondering if the current
> forker is really the right person to be supporting. My impressions
> are that he may not be as pro community as he says he is. At this
> point it sounds like he's the only one involved, and is not ready to
> give up control to a group any time soon.
>
> --Tim
>
> On June 26, 2003 10:09, Jason Gouger wrote:
> > Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > >On Thursday 26 Jun 2003 14:48, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >I find this very sad. Zach is not the first dev to leave like
> > > this. It would seem like the Chief Architect is not easy to work
> > > with.
> > >
> > >I do hope that my favourite distribution does not go the way of
> > > Caldera.
> > >
> > >Peter
> >
> > You really can't make any assumptions like that without hearing
> > both sides of the story. The article posted on slashdot was rather
> > one sided
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
