On Monday 30 June 2003 08:07 pm, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ date ; echo ${Owen Gunden}
> Monday 30 June 2003 11:42 pm
>
> > > What a terrible assumption. A well thought out and planned attack can
> > > be executed and completed sucessfully against Linux than it can
> > > Windows.
> >
> > I'll believe it when I see it. Where's your evidence that Linux is even
> > remotely as vulnerable as Windows?
>
> http://www.icculus.org/ ??? :-)
>
> OS are as much vulnerable as its administrator is a moron (oops, my English
> suck, but you know what I mean.) That's it. Period.Amen. Sysadmins are the downfall of both operating systems. Unfortunately, it's a lot easier to get behind in patches (unless you are using some nifty package management like portage ;)) in a Linux distribution than it is in Windows 2003, for example. > > > Windows XP has a form of their terminal services client/server out of > > > the box. How easy would it be to instruct your grandmother on how to > > > install, configure, and run a VNC server? It's just easier with > > > Windows in that aspect. > > KDE does remote desktop easy. Check it out when you have time. > > BTW, on Linux you can "ssh -X remotehost" and run applications on the > remote end on, both CLI and GUI based apps. I couldn't ssh into a windows > machine and get output from netstat for exaple, how useful is that? `ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED] can not control an existing X session, it can merely tunnel an application through to your X session. > > > And if you think I am a Windows supporter or troll, tell that to my 4 > > > Gentoo boxes. > > > > I think you're giving yourself too much credit for knowing how to run a > > linux box. It's not that hard, 13 year old kids do it, and some are > > probably better than you at it. > > > :-) See my reply to this fellow's post for more information on my alleged inexperience (and my age: 15). -- Zack Gilburd http://tehunlose.com GnuPG Key ID: A79A45668240AB6C
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
