On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:33:46AM -0400, brett holcomb wrote:
> If you blindly say update it then etc-update sure will 
> mess it up.  Every update that etc-update has wanted to do 
> has wanted to replace my /dev/... with /dev/BOOT and take 
> out my stuff and that would sure hose the system.  Other 
> than running it through an editor manually I don't know of 
> anyway to let etc-update do it.  I suppose you could try 
> an interactive update but for files like fstab I'll do it 
> by hadn.

As I said, you've got to pay attention - it's not a no-brainer.
etc-update lets you review each part of the patch and choose to do
hand-patching on the pieces that need it. Even for files like /etc/fstab
that require attention, it's less work (IMHO) than pulling both old and
new versions into editors and eyeballing every one of the changes.

Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 
> 
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:11:24 -0400
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:00:59AM -0400, brett holcomb 
> >wrote:
> >>Well, if you use etc-update on files like /etc/fstab 
> >>your 
> >>system will break.  Also, when you modify your make.conf 
> >>file you don't want it overwritten mindlessly.  If you 
> >>notice etc-update will remove all your changes.
> >
> >etc-update won't break /etc/fstab if you pay attention to 
> >what you're
> >doing.
> >
> >The etc-update interface takes some getting used to... I 
> >made a mess
> >the first time I tried it - so it's a good idea to save 
> >the files you're
> >updating before you start. But once you get the hang of 
> >using it, it's
> >a lot less trouble than doing it by hand.
> >
> >Nathan Meyers
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>
> >>On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:42:59 -0400
> >> Ben Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>why not use etc-update?  seems to save much hassle and 
> >>>time for me.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 02:30, Joshua Banks wrote:
> >>>>Come-on... No fish in the Gentoo pond..tonight
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> >
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 
> 
> 

-- 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to