On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 10:07:28 -0500
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Has anyone successfully compiled OpenOffice 1.1 with GCC 3.3? I know 
> there is that check in the ebuild for 3.2, but I copied it to the 
> overlay dir and removed that check. I'm currently compiling with 
> 3.3.1-r4. I'm just trying to get an idea of whether or not I'm wasting 
> my time. I have an Athlon 1GHz with 512Mb RAM, so the compile should 
> take about 3 days or so ;)
> 

I succesfully compiled openoffice with the same version of gcc (3.3.1-r4) just
today, after changing the "!=" in ebuild to "<" as mentioned elsewhere in this
thread. It took some 16 hours on my celeron 2.2ghz.

-- 
/~\ The ASCII        Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <andrej at kacian dot sk>
\ / Ribbon Campaign  GnuPG public key ID: 7CD93FE2 (pgp.mit.edu)
 X  Against HTML     Key fingerprint:
/ \ Email!           E87D 9DEF 2A23 6FFB 7AD9 542F 4253 3A46 7CD9 3FE2

"Don't forget that MS-Windows is just a temporary
 workaround until you can switch to a GNU system."
                                      --GnuPG creators

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to