It is rumored that on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 07:10:53 +0800 William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for me stability is the main issue. Never had much luck with the > binaries: a bit flaky but I also think its a YMMV issue. > > And not having much luck compiling 1.1 so far either. Still not ccache > friendly, and looks like either distcc or disk space burped at ~10hours > into the compile ... > > BillK > > > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 04:07, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 07:56, Andrej Kacian wrote: > > > On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 06:36:02 +0800 > > > > > > William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does "seem" faster, despite the flags filter. Not definitive, I > > > > know, but I "believe" I am better off with it compiled. > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > I had the ximian patched version compile and run fine under 3.3.1 (from www.breakmygentoo.net) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The advantage of a bad memory is that one enjoys several times the same good things for the first time. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
