I really like this idea, and I think it might be desireable for gentoo servers (who should RARELY upgrade a kernel). Send this idea to the dev list.
Nathaniel On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 17:30, blade- wrote: > i use the gs sources, had an update today and a few days ago > > Jeffrey Smelser wrote: > > >What kernel you using that is updated so often?? if its 2.6, thats the price you > >pay for using it as its always going to be updated.. > > > >why not just use protage.mask and then when you want to update your kernel, remove > >it... Just keep up with the announce list in case of security concerns.. > > > >personally, I have not seen my kernel come up in awhile.. > > > > > > > >>Would it be possible to have the kernel updates as a separate > >>class. I > >>mean like have system, world and kernel. some of the kernels > >>get updated > >>quite frequently, most of the time i don't use the updates as i am > >>trying to get a good uptime. i only want to update the kernel if it > >>fixes a bug i run into or a security vulnerability. Would > >>this be easy > >>to implement? and is there anyone else that would find this useful? > >> > >> > > > >-- > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
