Bjoern Michaelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:28:48PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Yes, for my usage (2 user home network) mbox is superior. But of >> course we are now into the slippery ground of opinion. For me its >> simpler and more tools recognize it by default. Such as mutt and a >> number of home written perl scripts and etc. > Well, we are on a slippery ground indeed, but mutt works perfectly with > maildir, when the maildir USE-Flags is set ...
Bjoern, thanks for you major contributions on this thread... very helpfull. Now about that slippery ground... > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . but mutt works perfectly with > maildir That is of course not by default as I stipulated. That is, mutt comes from mutt developers in a release pkg. That pkg understands mbox with no tweaking (by default) not maildir or some other formats. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
