Mick writes:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:38:05 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > I used to be a big Konqueror fan until about six months ago. Then I
> > tried Chromium and was blown away by its speed and the way it works
> > on more sites. I do miss some of the integration of Konqueror and
> > its kio-slaves and still use it for non-web duties. When the
> > inevitable feature creep hits Chromium and it slows down, can see
> > myself going back to Konqueror.
I did not want to use Chromium, but I tried it, and I must admit, it's
fast, and it uses much less memory than konqueror. And it even has web
shortcuts, which are a must-have for me now. What I'm missing most now is
mouse gestures.
> I tried Chromium six months ago and it was not crashing, but couldn't
> really tell the difference in speed from Opera for most sites. In
> terms of performance it is Opera, FF, Konqueror here, with Konqueror
> not managing some Javascripts at all.
Opera, this might also be an idea. I never used it much, only in some
cases when Konqueror had problems with web pags.
> Alex, have you tried turning off the Nepomuke service? I see in one of
> your screenshots that you are having problems with it (segfaults).
No. The screenshot was taken shortly after logging in, the log shows the
Strigi crashes. So I turned off Strigi, but kept Nepomuk.
Wonko
