On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote: > > > 2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99 > > > > It should also come after 2.2, but I appear to have missed that > > release. > > Why? 2.2 == 2.2.0
Not in portage's eyes. > > So 2.2.0_alpha1 would make a logical progression. Since when did an alpha come after release candidates? That's anything but logical. In order to fool portage into considering the alpha to be later, the version had to be bumped from 2.2 to 2.2.0. -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 20: Synthetic natural gas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
