On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 July 2011 13:48:45 Bill Longman wrote: >> On 07/19/2011 07:43 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 19 July 2011 12:39:09 Stroller wrote: >> >> On 19 July 2011, at 00:36, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> >> Unless there is some family or intimate connection the rest of us are >> >> unaware of, there are no grounds for you to be offended on behalf of a >> >> convicted murderer. >> > >> > I am not offended because of a murderer. I am offended by your weak >> > trolling. Somebody asks some raiser4 related questions and little >> > trolls like you pop up and spout their crap. All the fucking time. >> >> Volker! This is the heart of the problem and you fail to see it. >> Stroller is *hardly* a troll but, as others have pointed out, you took >> his humor to be trolling. No one else did, so take another look. > > it is either trolling or tasteless. > > Does it become ok because it was a tasteless joke instead of an answer to a > serious question?
Sure; humor is subjective. People who 'get' the joke are welcome to dislike it, but it's still understood to be in jest, and not taken seriously. -- :wq
