On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g. > commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected in a > bad way by this move.
Comment here? The devs are still CCed even though it's closed: https://bugs.gentoo.org/250179 > To be honest I didn't look for a solution in b.g.o because it was > straightforward; even if not so manifest for me the link between the > perl flag and the ability for rxvt to run tabbed (given that it doesn't > give an error). > > I don't want to be blunt, but your plan looks to me quite vague. > My opinion is that some packages should have a different default. That bug is for adding IUSE defaults, rather than removing the flag.
