On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g.
> > commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected
> > in a bad way by this move.
>
> Comment here? The devs are still CCed even though it's closed:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/250179
>
> > To be honest I didn't look for a solution in b.g.o because it was
> > straightforward; even if not so manifest for me the link between
> > the perl flag and the ability for rxvt to run tabbed (given that
> > it doesn't give an error).
> >
> > I don't want to be blunt, but your plan looks to me quite vague.
> > My opinion is that some packages should have a different default.
>
> That bug is for adding IUSE defaults, rather than removing the flag.
Added a brief comment, let's see developers' reaction.
Francesco
--
Linux Version 3.0.6-gentoo, Compiled #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Oct 8 20:18:59
CEST 2011
Two 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Processors, 4GB RAM, 4019.26 Bogomips Total
aemaeth
