On Sun, 27 May 2012 04:29:17 +0000, Joshua Murphy wrote:

> Well, given that it's there, it cleans up after itself, and it avoids
> issues in the instance where /var isn't available early on, is there
> much reason _not_ to link /var/run and /var/lock over to their
> respective equivalents on /run? And both with and without /var mounted
> (so they exist and are writable even if /var doesn't come up)? 

I did that months ago to resolve an issue with a specific package that
hadn't been updated to use /run at the time. I never got round to
removing the links and it has caused no problems.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to