On May 29, 2012 12:53 AM, "pk" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2012-05-28 05:44, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > But my newer servers has /run (and its children) from the get go, because I > > think it kind of makes sense. Even though they're udev-free. > > Hm... what is using /run instead of /var/run? I thought it was (newish) > udev itself and things like systemd that uses /run instead of > /var/run... just curious. > > Best regards > > Peter K >
Nothing that I know of, then. But I thought if sometime later down the road some braindead dev assumes that everyone uses udev and hardwired his/her package to assume /run exists, I'm covered :-) Rgds,
