Am 08.03.2013 10:02, schrieb Michael Hampicke: > Am 07.03.2013 22:49, schrieb Michael Mol: >> On 03/07/2013 04:44 PM, Grant wrote: >>>>> Thanks Michael, I think I will set up nginx to serve my images. That >>>>> should take a big load off apache. Is nginx still beneficial when >>>>> using the Worker MPM? >>>> >>>> It...depends? >>>> >>>> nginx in reverse caching proxy mode will simply serve up objects before >>>> the httpd it's protecting has to deal with them. Whether the type of an >>>> MPM makes a significant difference on nginx's value depends more on what >>>> kind of work you are (or aren't) asking Apache to do. I really couldn't >>>> answer that for you without knowing the details behind what you're >>>> running on top of Apache. >>> >>> OK, I think either nginx or Worker would help prevent MaxClients from >>> being reached and using both of them would help even further. >> >> If you're using mod_php, you cannot use MPM Worker. Just sayin. It's so >> unsupported, they block each other in Portage. >> > > But you can use worker in conjunction with php via fastcgi or php-fpm. > In the best event, that should slightly decrease apaches overall memory > footprint. >
Sorry, I meant the systems overall memory usage
