On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote > NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary > because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique > one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack thereof, in the case of IPV4). The people who are truly interested in speeding up IPV6 adoption should do their best to shut up the internet hippies who constantly rant and rave about how "NAT is evil". Don't let the cause get distracted by that unrelated issue. Focus on the core issue. -- Walter Dnes <[email protected]> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
