On Tue, 27 May 2014 07:38:01 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > Snapshotting hourly would mostly be a convenience - in theory it > should get you time-machine-like functionality just like hourly > backups would, but with far less overhead and space use. > > In practice I stopped doing this, as btrfs can misbehave when you > start getting a lot of snapshots accumulated (we're talking > thousands).
I've read that too. I'm looking at doing a kind of round robin thing where a script makes a snapshot and then deletes the oldest one. -- Neil Bothwick ... "I'm simply not a nice girl", she whispered tartly.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
