On Sep 21, 2014 5:10 PM, "Tom H" <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Mark David Dumlao <madum...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Point is he's trying to paint the picture that systemd folks rattle on and > > on about its speed, but they don't. > > The speed argument/anti-argument can be traced back to Lennart's first > blog post on systemd (IIRC "rethinking pid 1") where he touted its > speeding up of the boot process. The reason that's regularly brought > up is that there aren't (m)any purely technical counterpoints to > systemd so boot speed (and binary logs but the latter can be disabled > with setting "Storage=none" in "journald.conf" and setting up a socket > for syslog to store the logs) are targeted.
Im well aware of Lennart talking about it but the relevant matter is whether it was ever brought up in the conversation or not. If youre saying its on me to prove a claim you better be fucking sure i made or care about the claim in the first place. And on this list its consistently the anti-fanboys that make the claim, because even Lennart himself doesnt emphasize the speed as much as is imagined - he often mentions it as a mere side effect of a "clean" bootup. Id link you the posts that say so if i werent on a moving train. >
