On 11/11/14 07:20, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote > >> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild* >> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with >> instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we >> are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto >> proper upstream /dev manager. > What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications > done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how > long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux > kernel? >
I expect systemd-udevd to be migrated into kdbus, which means libudev, libgudev-1.0 and the systemd-udevd binary itself will likely need the libsystemd-bus library, which we will then package and ship together with sys-fs/udev Or if systemd-udevd binary starts requiring a running service of some of the systemd services, then we will make those available as well and run the from the udev-init-scripts, or possibly even adjust sys-apps/openrc to compensate for the inadequaties Just trying to say, that even with kdbus pending, I'm not worried at all - Samuli
