Dale wrote: > Raffaele BELARDI wrote: >> I have three users on my ~amd64 gentoo including myself. The two other >> users have identical and very limited rights. For me and one user flash >> in seamonkey works fine, for the other user it is blocked by seamonkey >> being 'insecure', although the seamonkey binary and the flash plugin >> (www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.637) are installed system-wide. >> >> I don't understand why the different behaviour, any suggestions? >> > > Notice how I have two > versions of adobe-flash installed? I don't think that is normal. I > manually -C the older version and now youtube and such works fine. It > now looks like this: > > You may want to see if two versions are installed at the same time. It > appears that if it is, it tries to use the older version. Don't ask me > how two versions can be installed at the same time tho. I dunno. I > don't think it is supposed to do that for this package tho. The command > I used is this: >
I understood that the -11 is required for some (NPAPI whateverthatis) browsers including Firefox[1]. Actually I recently tried to remove -11 from another system and mythbrowser stopped displaying flash. Anyway, I will try the suggestion with the seamonkey browser. raffaele [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash
