On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:02 AM Corbin Bird <corbinb...@charter.net> wrote:
> I noticed something odd about the microcode however ... > > amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin 7876 -> 5356 bytes > . > The size dropped by 2Kb? > So is the "fix" actually disabling fixes for other problems? > . As far as I can tell there is no evidence that the new microcode fixes anything, or that the old microcode it replaces fixes anything. At least the size is objectively measurable. :) Presumably the newer microcode is better in some way, or at least somebody thought it is, possibly based on some knowledge of what it does. -- Rich
