Re: [gentoo-user] why both /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 on a 64bit system?

[Laurence Perkins]

On February 15, 2021 4:15:43 AM PST, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> 
wrote:
>On Sunday, 14 February 2021 21:48:36 GMT Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>> Am Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:51:30PM -0500 schrieb Jack:
>> > As I remember, /lib and /usr/lib hold not only 32 bit libraries,
>but
>> > non-arch or arch-irrelevant (I know there's a better term) files.
>> 
>> arch-agnostic? ;-)
>
>No, it should be arch-neutral. Agnosticism is about religion and has
>nothing 
>to do with it.

Technically "canonical" also only applies to religious texts.  That doesn't 
keep us from using it descriptively in other areas.

Bigger problem is that "arch agnostic" would mean only that the program is 
incapable of knowing what the arch was.  Not that it can work with any arch or 
that the arch is irrelevant.  So "independent" or "neutral" is a better choice 
in this context.

LMP