-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > What do you need PAM for, when there's basically just one > (human) user on the system and the system acts as a "consumer" > (ie. no servers)? Why add the complexity of PAM? Where's > the gain - in *THAT* scenario?
Learning. The whole point of using free, open source software. if you do not want to get messy, then use windows. Anyway, if this user chosed all of his use flags, then he is probably willing to LEARN. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDf0ByAlpOsGhXcE0RAuGDAJ9vG4vf9p2LAWDvX8czlG9g7L1BvwCaAzqG KeFEVL6VTrUF2LffpV3L/Gg= =yBYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
