On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, maxim wexler wrote:
> > Will audacious not work for you?
>
> Haven't tried yet. Fellow down the list says it's a
> resource hog like mplayer.
I don't have xmms any more to compare against, but audacious seems to be
almost identical to it as far as I can tell. As far as memory usage, it's
much less than, say, firefox. It is presently at the top of my CPU usage,
but it's still only taking 1% of the CPU, so it's hard to complain.
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
[email protected] mailing list
