On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
> And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me
> over all over again. :)
I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with
building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why
stop?
Acutally, while I'm on the subject of features - here's another one I'd
like to see: parallel merges instead of parallel makes. Since many
packages have problems with MAKEOPTS, it doesn't help with configure
scripts anyway and other parts of the process, why not spawn 2 or 3
emerges automatically? Each one could do it's own "tree" of packages
and dependencies that don't affect the other... would be nice IMHO.
cya,
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
People think love is an emotion. Love is good sense.
-- Ken Kesey
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
