Good point, Mike!    John.


Quoting "Mike MacCracken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> For those activities aimed at reducing the intensity of some major impacts
> (e.g., limiting Arctic warming, limiting ocean warming in regions of
> hurricane intensification, limiting ocean acidification), I think a more
> appropriate term might well be "impact intervention"--save "geoengineering,"
> "climate restoration," and "global temperature stabilisation" for the
> efforts (e.g., by global sulfate injection, mirrors in space, etc.) to limit
> global climate change.
>
> Mike MacCracken
>
> On 11/25/08 10:26 AM, "John Latham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hello John, Ken et al.,
>>
>> I've always liked "climate restoration" because - though we'll never
>> achieve it precisely - it's what we're seeking, and is much less
>> likely to scare the pants off the public than the imperious
>> "geo-engineering".
>>
>> But when we're trying to be as exact as possible my choice is "global
>> temperature stabilisation". It is, in principle, possible to hold the
>> Earth's average temperature (however it's defined) constant: whereas
>> we can't restore the climate to exactly as it was - at least with
>> current ideas & technology.
>>
>> I think both these terms have their place: to be determined by   
>> circumstances.
>>
>> Cheers,    John.
>>
>>                               *****************
>>
>> Quoting "John Nissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>> Finding the right terminology is important in persuading people that
>>>  what you are doing is sensible.
>>>
>>> "Cooling" and "refrigeration" could bring fears of overdoing the
>>> geoengineering, e.g. accidentally triggering an Ice Age (as some
>>> journalists worry!).
>>>
>>> I prefer the term "climate stabilisation".  We may need to cool the
>>> Arctic well below its current temperature in order for the sea ice
>>> to reform, but for non-polar regions (i.e. most of the rest of the
>>> world), our initial aim should be to halt global warming - no more,
>>> no less.  Basically the idea is to stop things getting worse.
>>>
>>> But an even better term might be "climate restoration", as we'd like
>>>  to stop droughts rather than prolong them, restore the Arctic to a
>>> former condition, reverse the spread of deserts, etc.  Thus, if
>>> possible, we could produce regional effects on climate for the
>>> benefit of those regions that have been already adversely affected
>>> by global warming.  BTW, this is where marine cloud brightening
>>> could prove invaluable.
>>>
>>> Politically, I think "restoration" has the better connotations and
>>> sounds more valuable.  And it leaves open the door to negotiate how
>>> far the restoration and to what original state/date (e.g. 80%
>>> towards pre-industrial).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>   From: Ken Caldeira
>>>   To: geoengineering
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:10 AM
>>>   Subject: [geo] the science and technology of climate cooling ???
>>>
>>>
>>>   I'd like to toss two other names into the ring for direct
>>> interventions into the climate system designed to cool Earth's
>>> climate:
>>>
>>>   1.  Climate refrigerators produce climate refrigeration
>>>
>>>   Literally, "to refrigerate" means in its original sense is "to
>>> cool again".  With threatened loss of Arctic systems, "cooling
>>> again" is likely to be the goal.
>>>
>>>   2. Climate cooler or climate cooling -- Colloquially, a "cooler"
>>> is a "refrigerator" . With the Arctic losses, we may look to the
>>> science and technology of climate cooling to reverse some of the
>>> effects of global warming.
>>>
>>>   ___________________________________________________
>>>   Ken Caldeira
>>>
>>>   Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology
>>>   260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
>>>
>>>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>   http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab
>>>   +1 650 704 7212; fax: +1 650 462 5968
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>
>
>



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to