oliver,

i'm not sure what you "don't get about the whole last thread".  the
discussion seemed pretty straightforward, whichever point of view
you're coming from.  i did ask for the specific reference on cooling
from your published papers.  you've pointed me at your entire
publication list--quite lengthy.  would you mind just sending a pdf of
the specific paper?

i'm quite surprised at the < 1% number above.  is this what has been
simulated in your model results?  so you're saying that the natural
rate of productivity in the southern ocean can only be increased by <
1% without disastrous consequences?  one would assume that is less
than the likely margin of error in the model itself, no?  what
happened during the last glacial/interglacial?  would the effect have
been the same?

what should victor be looking for during the lohafex experiment this
february to corroborate this prediction?  SST?

d

On Dec 16, 8:34 pm, Oliver Wingenter <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Dear Dan,
>
> I don't get the whole last thread.  If we fertilize more than 2% of
> the Southern ocean, we will over chill the area by more than 2 C.  So
> getting to 10, 15, 20, 50 per cent or more of the CO2 build up
> sequestered is rather fantasy unless we are prepared for an ice age.
>
> We have actual field data to support the over cooling (http://
> infohost.nmt.edu/~oliver/wingenter_pub.html; not all of which is my
> own) plus model results (biogeochemical POP to be submitted in Jan or
> Feb 2009).  What I am saying is the whole idea of massive OIF will
> never work.  Only less than 1% of the Southern ocean can be iron
> fertilized.
>
> What we need to be doing is protecting against Climate Terrorism or
> wanna be dogooders (or even carbon credit profiteers, dogooders for
> profit).  Imagine some rich prince in Dubai that has a skyscraper he
> would like to protect and would probably like the sea level to stay
> just where it is, one or two meters below Dubai. May be even receding
> a bit. I bet his cousin probably has a few oil tankers docked idol at
> this time.  Oil is low, Somali pirate are not.  Gee, iron sulfate is
> pretty cheap now too.  Next thing you know we have an ice age.  The
> Southern Ocean has had a critical impact on glacial periods and Sulfur
> has been a big part of it.  Too much iron in the wrong hands could
> chill the region 10 C or more and change the entire dynamics,
> atmosphere and ocean.  Even 2% iron addition is too much.
>
>  CO2 sequestration by OIF will never work but fertilizing of 1% or
> less of the Southern Ocean could stabilize the Antarctic ice sheets.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Oliver Wingenter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to