Diana, Call me old-fashioned, but I believe deeply in the virtues of transparency and honesty in debating matters as important as this. I welcome skepticism about geoengineering.
However, the disconnect between your press release and what is actually being suggested by the Royal Society report, or for that matter your private comments to me at the NAS meeting are disappointing. The way the ETC group has managed this, suggest to me not skepticism but its precise opposite closemindedness. I suspect that you don't want to live in a world where debate gets reduced to soundbites and interest group fight to distort facts to the maximum yet seems to me that is where the ETC Group is leading here. Why for example release a commentary with ad hominem comments like "tricksters" before you have even had a chance to look at the Royal society report. I note that ETC has a base in Ottawa, my hometown, and you could easily have taken the time to talk to me (as I have offered), but instead it seems that ETC would prefer to hold strong opinions without actually engaging substantively with other views. Is this really how you want to see public debate on important issues? Yours, David -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Diana Bronson Sent: August 28, 2009 1:35 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [geo] ETC Group on Royal Society Report: The Emperor's New Climate: Geoengineering as 21st century fairytale ETC Group News Release 28 August 2009 www.etcgroup.org SCIENCE FICTIONS: UK'S ROYAL SOCIETY TO ISSUE MAJOR REPORT ON GEOENGINEERING SEPTEMBER 1; BAN REAL-WORLD EXPERIMENTS, SAYS ETC GROUP The oldest scientific academy in the world, the UK's Royal Society, will release its long-awaited report on geoengineering September 1st 2009 in London. The report, drafted by a panel dominated by geoengineering enthusiasts, is widely expected to recommend that the government support more research and perhaps even real-world experimentation of these controversial new technologies that intentionally manipulate the earth's climate on a large scale with the aim of lessening the effects of climate change. "Geoengineering is a bad idea, and, unfortunately, it may transform Lord Rees's book from musings to memoir," says Diana Bronson, researcher for the international technology watchdog ETC Group, referring to the Royal Society President's 2004 book, Our Final Century, which suggested that humans may not live to see the end of the 21st century. Geoengineering can refer to sulphate-injections in the stratosphere and cloud-whitening to reflect sunlight away from the earth, fertilization of the oceans with iron nano-particles to try to increase their carbon-carrying capacity, intentionally modifying global weather patterns, among other techniques. "The Royal Society may be cautious in their report but, in fact, when it comes to geoengineering, a yellow light can quickly turn green. For the climate to take notice, any geoengineering scheme would have to be massive - sulphate particles or whitened clouds would have to deflect a lot of sunlight and ocean fertilization would have to cover great swathes of sea. Even the most careful computer models won't be able to predict what will happen if an experiment is scaled-up and moved out of doors," argues Bronson. "If governments believe there is a techno- fix to the climate change conundrum that will let them off the hook at the climate change treaty negotiations in Copenhagen, they will throw precious time and dollars at sci-fi fantasies, overlook potentially devastating side effects and divert their attention from the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions at source." ETC Group's new special report, "The Emperor's New Climate: Geoengineering as 21st century fairytale," questions the narratives commonly used by the geoengineering lobby to advance their agenda. "Contrary to what geoengineers are saying, this is a costly time- waster," says Bronson. The report calls for a broader international discussion and concludes that "any effort to experiment these technologies in the real world is nothing short of geopiracy and should be banned." ETC Group's special report, "The Emperor's New Climate: Geoengineering as 21st century fairytale," is available on the Internet at http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=762 -30- For more information: Diana Bronson (Montreal, Canada) [email protected] Phone: +1 514 273 6661; cell +1 514 629 9236 Kathy Jo Wetter (Durham, NC, USA) [email protected] Phone: +1 919 688 7302 Silvia Ribeiro (Mexico City) [email protected] Phone: 011 52 5555 6326 64 Molly Kane (Ottawa, Canada) [email protected] Phone: +1 613 241 2267, ext 26; cell +1 613 797-6421 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
