There is a problem here: we have been asking for emissions cuts for 20 years yet now there more emissions than ever--surely it is time other options were pursued. As well as emission cuts, NOT instead of emissions cuts.
On Nov 23, 5:43 am, Manu Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > I too disagree that there's a case for a SRM geoengineering intervention > without first acting on immediate, large and deep emission reductions. > > Thanks, > Manu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=.
