Manu, that studies published in the West on Himalayan melt are not very
accurate and there's no cause for alarm.

d.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Manu Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:

>   On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, David Schnare <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> According to the Indian glacier experts, the glaciers are experiences a
>> net gain at the moment, and have been stable (not shrinking) for the past
>> several years.
>>
>>
>
> No, not experts. Just one individual's non-peer reviewed analysis that R K
> Pachauri labelled baseless the day it was released.
>
> The individual who published this is a retired head of Geological Survey of
> India. The Ministry of Environment in India published his "findings" to gain
> support for its claim that studies published in the West on Himalayan melt
> are not very accurate and there's no cause for alarm.
>
> Lonnie Thompson responded to the news 
> here<http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/11/greenland_ice_and_himalayan_gl.html>
> .
>
> Manu
>
>
>


-- 
David W. Schnare
Center for Environmental Stewardship

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.


Reply via email to