Dan,

No personal attacks intended here, just a meeting summary.  I recall Kenneth
Coale pointing out, ³iron experiments are about how nature works; commercial
ocean seeding is about getting nature to work for us.²  It was my opinion
from the Wood¹s Hole meeting that Planktos was furthest out on a limb and
that Climos was acting (and has acted since) responsibly.

Thank you also for clarifying my thinking.

When I wrote "Our ignorance of a subject is a justification for not doing
field experiments.  Do what you like behind closed doors" I had firmly in
mind SRM (my major concern) in which atmospheric deployment could trigger a
large public backlash.  Please note I support research in the form of
enhanced computer modeling and laboratory studies to advance basic
understanding of atmospheric processes and climate interactions, but I am
enough of a student of Ed Lorenz to worry about large-scale deployment of
SRM. 

There is a different tradition in OIF.  The bottle and patch experiments
were initially aimed at understanding natural processes and later, when the
geoengineers arrived, turned toward speeding up the biological carbon pump
as a possible solution to global warming.  What I didn¹t wish to imply in my
comment was that what was established experimental practice in one field
(patch experiments in oceanography) could be generalized to all fields
(including atmospheric science).

Hope this helps.

Jim



On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 9:33 AM, James R. Fleming <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Having been at the Woods Hole meeting, I am well aware that the oceanographic
> community is interested in legitimate OIF ³patch² experiments and they were
> quite vexed by proprietary companies planning to go forward with
> commercialization plans.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to